Board Thread:Miiversepedia Announcement/@comment-26245386-20150315191510/@comment-26245386-20150315212727

Digit03 wrote: Kajad wrote: Digit03 wrote: While I'm fine with criticism, I'm not fine if it isn't "constructive". Constructive criticism is when you say something you like, and then say something you would improve. Not like "I think you're a terrible bureaucrat who should stop taking the Community Guidelines so seriously," but more like "I like the fact about how you're enthusiastic about Miiversepedia and want it to be safe and fun, but one thing I'd suggest would be to take the Community Guidelines a little less seriously."

Very little of the criticism I received was constructive, so yeah. If you're referring to me, I never explicitly stated that I hate how you manage this wiki. In fact, I'll tell you (constructively) how I feel about your methods right now:

- You've been really active on this wiki ever since you joined it (well, after mid-January anyway), and have created a lot of pages that helped increase our wiki's completeness level (although I think Segatendo did a better job). In addition, you've also been able to scrub the mainspace pages of bias, which was our main goal in the first place.

- However, you're far too strict regarding the wiki rules when applied to forums and message walls, hence why I think that we should have separate rulesets in respect to the differences between a forum and a wiki. In addition, you'll block users who violate certain rules (such as the swearing rule) even once, which as said above is far too strict. I can understand why you think the swearing rule is too strict. However, one of our biggest rules since the beginning has been no swearing, which was one of the main reasons why Miiversepedia was created (the other one was no bias). Read #21